Educator, Thinker, Consultant

Category: Moodle (Page 7 of 8)

Moodle vs Google Classroom

Dr Jak Tangkuampien, over at Jak’s Thoughts, has a terrific write up about Moodle vs Google Classroom. I had been thinking many of the same thoughts, but he has written up before I did. Give his post a good read. But first, I’d like to expand on couple of thoughts about Moodle vs Google Classroom.

Underlying pedagogy

Google Classroom does a really good job of replicating what many teachers are very comfortable doing already. That is, Google Classroom allows teachers to create documents (templates) that are then distributed to the students to complete and turn in. Google Classroom organizes this nicely. This is analogous to creating a worksheet and passing it out to students. Classroom does make this a digital transaction, but it doesn’t fundamentally change the relationship or the process of education.

Moodle was founded with constructivist educational strategies in mind. Founded by Martin Dougiamas, Moodle was the result of his experience with distance learning in the Australian outback. He was also interested in social constructivist teaching strategies.

Developed by Teachers

Whereas Moodle is developed by educators with an educational bent, Classroom is designed by engineers geared toward education. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. Engineers can come up with wonderful ideas.

Long term viability

Google has a tendency to iterate, iterate, iterate. That means that things change. Most of the time, this is for the best. However, as a long time user of Google Reader, well, as a former user of Google Reader, I can tell you that relying on Google to have a product around forever and lead to disappointment. Google killed Google Reader back in 2013. This was after Google had effectively killed off all the other RSS readers but making Reader free and phenomenal. Similarly, Google has retired many other products. A few come to mind:

  • Google Wave
  • Google Health
  • iGoogle
  • Knol

Google has no problem discontinuing products that it no longer feels deserve it’s attention. One must be aware that the discontinuation of a product is definitely a possibility. Thus, given this history, the end of Google Classroom is always a possibility.

Moodle is open source. Even if Martin Dougiamas (founder of Moodle) decides to move on, Moodle can continue to be developed. In fact, there are several forks of Moodle already in existence. Thus, Moodle is sure to be around for quite some while.

Flexibility

Google Classroom handles the distribution and collection of materials. Using Google tools, the teacher can also create quizzes that students complete. Moodle does these things as well. However, Moodle has a great more flexibility and functionality built in.

Jak’s Thoughts

Jak’s Thoughts is a nice write up. He includes things like multiple teachers, groups, the ability to create prior to distribution and more. Multiple teachers is a huge issue for my district. We utilize team teaching throughout the district. Moodle allows for that collaboration to happen easily. Teachers can allow other teachers to just view, to help with grading or to fully edit a course. This power is greatly needed.

Overall

Google Classroom is a nice tool. It has a beneficial role for teachers. The learning curve to get started is certainly much lower than Moodle. If you are looking for an investment that can lead to true change, Moodle is hard to beat. If you are looking to move toward using digital tools and taking a small step with low barriers, Google Classroom is a great choice.

Completion Tracking in Moodle

Completion tracking is a terrific feature in Moodle. This allows the teachers, and I would argue even more importantly, and the students to keep track of what they have accomplished (completed) and how much is left to go. Of course, since this is Moodle, the teacher has the option to control both of those settings. Sometimes it is important to just let students know what they’ve done. The course may be a work in progress and not have everything completely entered. In that case, the completion total would not be turned on.

There are actually two parts to completion tracking: Activity completion and Course completion.

Completion tracking works really well in conjunction with badges.

Activity completion is a great way to provide students with visual evidence that they have done something. Activity completion comes in two main flavors, students can mark something as complete, or students have to do something in order for the activity to be complete. What the students have to do varies by the type of activity. Generally, students have to view, submit or receive a grade for something to be automatically marked as complete.

This can be very powerful for students. It can help teach them responsibility and provide the with useful information.

The second portion, Course Completion, works in conjunction with Activity completion. (Though there are also other parameters that can be used). Completion tracking must first be enabled by the site administrator. Once the site administrator has flipped the switch to make it available, Course Completion tracking can be turned on in any course. Just visit the Course administration settings. (Click on “Edit settings” under Course Administration. You will see a section called (surprise) “Completion Tracking”. Set the “Enable completion tracking” to Yes.)

Once all the activities are set up, the teacher can select them as part of the Course completion requirements. Visit the Course Completion link under Course administration.

I also suggest that the teacher add the Course Completion Status block to the site. This gives the students a quick view of what they have completed.

Moodle Social Wall

Moodle & eCommunity | REMC 13 2015-01-25 19-50-43I’m a big believer in Moodle. Moodle has the power and flexibility to provide an excellent, full featured learning experience for teachers and students.

The biggest roadblocks for Moodle are the learning curve and the “look and feel”. The learning curve is what it is. Moodle is powerful software and there is some learning to do. (Boy, if only someone would write some examples to learn Moodle effectively). So, there really isn’t too much to do about the learning curve. Teachers will put in the effort to learn once they really realize the value.

The other issue then, is the look and feel. Moodle can look a little dated. Yes, there are lots of themes that can change the look and feel. (Moodle seems to have acknowledged this in large part. There are only a couple of simple themes included in the core release now.) However, there really isn’t a super easy way to change the size or fonts of the Topic sections. There are icons which correspond to different activities. While these are informative, they also look dated.

What to do? Well, I also get to work with the very talented Mr. Chris Kenniburg. We’ve been talking for a couple of years about making Moodle more user friendly. One of the topics of discussions was to make Moodle more “Facebook” like. Teachers are very familiar with Facebook and would find that easy to use. Unfortunately, the work was beyond the budget that I could creatively find. However, Chris is resourceful. He worked with Bryan Smith of Ingham County ISD to garner funding through a grant to implement.

And they did. They have now unveiled the first run of the Moodle Social Wall (originally named the e-Community – seems naming can be more tricky than one thinks). This can be downloaded and installed (note though that there is still some tweaking to do) by REMC members (the plan is to provide an open source edition later on).

So why bother with all the trouble and work of writing a grant, pitching the idea, working up the schemas, etc? The whole idea is to more readily get teachers involved in using Moodle. I’ve seen many teachers spend lots of time chasing “bright shiny” things (web sites, web apps, etc) and become frustrated. I sat down with one teacher and we talked through the time that she had spent learning different “bright, shiny” things. (This was after a student had creatively placed lots of text in a Padlet that she had created. She wanted to know who it was. There was no way to know.) We very quickly ran up a tab of over 20 hours that she had spent learning things that she was no longer using due to inadequacies, frustrations, limitations, etc. I calmly pointed out that those 20 hours would’ve gotten her pretty far in Moodle. (For some odd reason, that didn’t make her feel any better or happier 😉 ).

So, with the Social Wall format, the idea is to allow educators a very comfortable environment with the full power of Moodle behind it. The Social Wall looks and acts very much like popular social networking tools. Educators can use the Social Wall and work just fine. They will have the extra advantages of being able to create Quizzes, add resources and more. They will also absolutely have the power over their own data. However, if the educator ever decides to transform their site into a more structured course, the power and structure of Moodle will be right there.

Seriously, this is good stuff. Take a look.

Moodle and Social

Moodle is extremely powerful. However, it could be prettier. Well, at least some of us think so. One of the issues that some teachers face is that they are accustomed to using Social media (like Facebook) and have that as a reference point. Well, what if you could combine the power of Moodle with the familiar interface of Facebook?

Some really bright and influential people have teamed up to answer just that question. REMC has funded an effort to bring a much more social format to Moodle. This involves a degree of programming to make everything work. Moodle is built for this type of customization. The goal is to officially launch the project in January of 2015. The launch is projected for the Michigan Moodle Moot.

This is really about more than making Moodle pretty. It is about lowering the cognitive load for teachers and students. It is about providing a pathway to use Moodle. It is about lowering the barriers of entry. The hope is that this will give teachers and students an easy way to get involved with Moodle. Then, as teachers are ready, they can expand to advantage of the wide variety of tools that are available within Moodle.

Want to know more? Check out the video below.

What do you think? Would this be of interest to you?

This is a first implementation. So improvements will be made. We will be combining this with the evolve-D theme as well.

Handwriting xml code

xml code exampleWell, it finally happened. The latest update to Mac OS X, Yosemite, broke one piece of software that I use every week – Podcast Maker. I’ve been using Podcast Maker for many years. It did one thing, turn basic text information into nicely formed code that I could then copy into TextWrangler in order to create the xml file for iTunes to recognize the latest podcast episode. Very handy. I believe that I paid $35 for it at some point. It was $35 well spent.

Now, I’m back to hand coding the xml file. Although not my favorite activity, there is a certain challenge to it. Coding is either right or not. Thus, if I do happen to make a mistake, the podcast feed just doesn’t work. I do get nearly immediate feedback on the process. Did I get everything right or not? I know as soon as I upload the file and hit refresh in iTunes. If the new episode shows up, I got it right. If not, well……

How often do we provide students with that same experience? Not waiting for the teacher to validate the work, but objective, right or wrong feedback? Not everything fits into the model. But, immediate feedback is pretty powerful. This is one reason that I was so happy to find the rubric grading model in Moodle. And the teacher who uses it for feedback on oral presentations. Sure, students can get some immediate feedback on a presentation, but that feedback is probably too nuanced for them to truly understand.

One thing that I really like about Moodle is the power and flexibility to provide students with feedback. Feedback can occur instantaneously with known answers (like multiple choice or cloze) or can be provided by the teacher. Feedback is powerful. According to Marzano, providing feedback is one of the high-yield strategies. I can attest that when it comes to hand coding xml files, it sure is effect.

Moodle 2.8

Moodle 2.8 is expected to ship in mid-November. The next release will focus on improving the Gradebook (one area where Moodle can use some consistency). The Gradebook has seen some improvements but with 2.8 should become a fully functioning feature. 2.8 will focus on bringing many improvements. Let’s take a look at a few.

New Grader Report.

The new Grader report will utilize the whole window for presentation. This will increase the amount of information available. This follows the improvement of being able to always view columns (student names). The new Grader will also provide smooth scrolling in all directions (Yea!). Additionally, all platforms will be supported, including tablets and phones. Since the world is really going mobile, this is a welcome focus. “Single view” mode will allow editing of any row or column on its own. A big, Hallelujah on this one. This will be very handy for actually entering grades.

New Natural weighting aggregation method

This will allow for grades to be combined simply. It also will provide a “clearer interface for using weights”. I’m a bit less excited about this one. Weighting of grades is something that seems to be confusing for many teachers. This is one of the areas that could truly use improvement for some teachers. Many teachers understand weights and use them well. However, in my experience, far too many don’t really, truly understand how weighting works.

Improved Grader setup page

There will be a new design with easier terminology and clearer layout. Making things clear and easy to understand is always a good thing. Too many times there is circular logic in the explanation or definitions in Moodle.

Improved Grade import/export

This falls into the nice, but not an earth shaker for me. I’ve exported the grades as .CSV files. That is a pretty robust and useful format.

Other improvements

Several other improvements are on the way. Forum module will have a reply by email feature. Assignment module will have an option to add additional files. Choice module will allow for more than one choice to be made. Database will add fields that can be marked as required. Quiz will get additional completion options. (Completion is a powerful tool within Moodle that is frequently overlooked.) Lesson module will allow for introductions.

My thoughts

Moodle keeps getting better and better. It is the most powerful of the LMS’s that I’ve used. The modularity of Moodle is a real strength. However, it is not always the prettiest belle at the ball. Indeed, sometimes it can be downright ugly. One of the groups that I worked with was ready to get rid of Moodle because it looked so “dated”. The teachers were sure that the students wouldn’t use it because of the look. I quickly tweaked a few things (theme change, reorganize to 2 columns over the standard 3 column, and some color changes) and the teachers were ecstatic. They now love the “look and feel” of the site.

This leads me to believe that Moodle really should address the overall design philosophy of the program. Well, that experience and working with many, many other teachers. Creating an exciting, easy to use experience could help propel Moodle even further. Yes, I’m am aware that there are many themes out there. However, the default look and feel is still a very powerful undercurrent for the program.

Overall, I’m excited about using Moodle and where it is going. It is a truly powerful tool that is on a great track for educators.

Moodle & Google Classroom

Introducing Classroom for Google Apps for Education 2014-09-07 13-59-08 2014-09-07 13-59-11

Google Classroom is now available for Google Apps for Education users. Please note that you must be a Google Apps customer to use Classroom. Google Classroom comes with the tag line More teaching, Less tech-ing. One of the major points of Classroom is the move to paperless. The bullet points include:

  • Easy to set up
  • Saves time
  • Improves organization
  • Enhances communication
  • Affordable and secure

In the real world, how does this play out? I’ve only had a limited experience with Classroom so far, but here are my thoughts.

Enrollment

Originally, anyone in the district could sign in as a teacher. There was absolutely no way to control this. Whenever a user went to Classroom, the user was asked if they were a Student or Teacher. If they clicked the Teacher button, they were automatically given teacher privileges. This means that anyone could create a class and enroll students. Furthermore, the actual setting was for anyone verified or pending. Thus, once the district administrator went in, students could be rejected. However, if the administrator never checked, the students would always have access. More importantly, the potential for frustration, miscommunication and misunderstanding is huge. Google did pretty quickly add a setting into the administrative counsel to adjust the setting to verified only. This means that users can request to be a teacher, but an administrator must approve them before they are ready to use Classroom. This is largely because teachers are essentially just members of a special Group. This group can now be pre-populated by uploading a csv file. However, this is extra work. We already have all of our teachers in an OU (organizational unit) within Google. It’s frustrating that we can’t just use that.

Appearance

Google Classroom is simple and appealing in looks. There is a large header graphic and then a two column layout. The left hand column is narrower and holds information (Upcoming assignments, Class code). The right hand column contains the main feed (box to update status and a listing of previous posts). The posts come in two flavors:

  • Announcements
  • Assignments

This makes it very easy to, well, make and announcement or add an assignment. The feed looks very similar to Facebook or Google+. It is simple to read.

Use

From a teacher perspective, the assignment feed is very powerful. There is one button to click Assignment to create a new assignment. Then fill in a couple of fields (Title, Description, Due), click on an icon to upload an assignment, to add one from Drive, from YouTube, or a link. If the teacher picks a document that is in Google Drive, they can choose how to distribute it to the students:

  • Students can view file
  • Students can edit file
  • Make a copy for each student

This makes it really easy to create a template document and distribute to students. Essentially, Google Classroom creates a shared folder (called Classroom) in the teacher’s Drive folder. Each class that the teacher creates is a folder within the Classroom folder. Then each assignment becomes a folder within the class folder. Each students’ assignment is a file within this folder. This means that if the teacher is familiar with Google Drive, this will be familiar. However, I can easily see this getting out of hand quickly. We’ll need to monitor this.

Classroom and Moodle

The process of enrolling teachers and students is a pretty much a wash. Moodle is easier for us (district administrators) to get teachers enrolled. It also requires no additional attention by us. New teachers are automatically assigned the proper permissions when they are hired and put into an OU. For students, the process is very similar.

In terms of appearance, Classroom wins. It is very pleasing to eye. There are some discoverability issues, as in “What do I click?, but mostly it is very quick to learn and very not confusing. It looks like a 21st century application. Moodle is making strides, but still lags behind. Moodle does present all of the options that you have though.

In terms of use, well, this will need a few more posts. Suffice it to say that Classroom is very easy to use in terms of recreating the worksheet model. That is, if you consider a teacher’s job to be handing out worksheets, Classroom does this really, really well. It the major concern is to move to a paperless system, Classroom is a great choice. This is not to say that great things can’t be done. They can. However, I’m concerned that this become substitution only. Moodle has more powerful options, more opportunities for changing the way of teaching.

My thoughts

This is not an either/or for us at this point. We’ll offer both to teachers and hope that they take advantage of both. Classroom seems very limited right now. However, teachers also need to get used to using online tools. The learning curve for Classroom is lower than Moodle. It is my hope that Classroom will lead to teachers wanting more power and options and control. Then Moodle will be a great choice.

 

Moodle Badges

BadgeOne of the topics at the professional development session that I recently delivered that was a real hit was Moodle Badges. (I’ve provided a link to a popular Moodle Badge provider – where you can get a bunch of ready made badges, but, in truth, I created my own for the project).

I set up the training so that each teacher earned a badge before we really started talking about them. They were thrilled to realize that they had earned a badge. When we circled back around to talk about the various blocks that were being displayed, badges was one of the blocks, they had all earned a badge. A couple of them were positively giddy. They saw the advantages of badges right away. (This is a group that is employing game play simulations into their project).

Badges are pretty simple to create. I use GIMP to make badges. GIMP is free and open source – though it has a pretty big learning curve, once you have a basic badge, creating variations can be pretty simple.

Although Moodle makes it easy to award badges for students viewing badges, the process of conditionally awarding a badge needs improvement. For example, right away the teachers wanted to award a badge based upon a certain score on a quiz. This involves a trip to the grade book and setting a passing grade. It should be much easier than that. When you are setting up the criteria for the badge, there should be a field to enter the percentage that awards the badge. This would allow a teacher to award a variety of “levels” of badges.

No matter what, check out badges and get your kids involved.

Moodle Professional Development

MoodleRecently I’ve been invited to work on a project which involves theming Moodle, developing a self-paced course and delivering some professional development. This is an exciting project. The courses that are being developed are STEM related and very high quality. There are several features that I love about this project.

  1. Excellent teachers are writing the course material.
  2. These same excellent teachers are using the course material with students.
  3. The material is being vetted by additional teachers.
  4. Moodle.
  5. The opportunity to work with some really great people.

I’ve written a rough draft of the self-paced course that will be used with new teachers coming into the project. I had the opportunity to work collaboratively with another member of the team. This was a terrific experience. It is such a pleasure to work with a variety of people that truly care about student learning.

I’ve delivered the professional development to a small group of teachers. They were very enthusiastic about what Moodle can do. They learned some of the benefits of using Moodle. (I’m certain that there are some students who will be earning badges soon).

I’ve received some terrific feedback on the self-paced course and will be incorporating suggestions back into the course.

I will say that it feels terrific to get plenty of positive feedback on a presentation and work.

Moodle Tip – Grading Presentations


Grade

In chatting with a teacher who uses Moodle really well in class, I’ve learned a neat trick (which will be making it into an upcoming book). He uses the Assignment Module to quickly and easily grade presentations. He does this by utilizing Rubrics. The students don’t turn anything in. However, as they are giving the presentation, he has the Rubric open within Moodle. He simply clicks on the appropriate level for each criterion within the rubric. He also adds comments (a text box associated with each criterion) so that the students understand why he selected the level of each criterion. This way, he is done grading when the presentations are done. Brilliant. Absolutely Brilliant.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Troy Patterson

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑